Journal of
Marketing Development and Competitiveness






Scholar Gateway


Abstracts prior to volume 5(1) have been archived!

Issue 5(1), October 2010 -- Paper Abstracts
Girard  (p. 9-22)
Cooper (p. 23-32)
Kunz-Osborne (p. 33-41)
Coulmas-Law (p.42-46)
Stasio (p. 47-56)
Albert-Valette-Florence (p.57-63)
Zhang-Rauch (p. 64-70)
Alam-Yasin (p. 71-78)
Mattare-Monahan-Shah (p. 79-94)
Nonis-Hudson-Hunt (p. 95-106)



JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE

A Cascading Effect: How Do Audit Rotation Rules Affect Loan Officers’ Perceptions and Decisions for Nonpublic Companies?


Author(s): Adrian L. Mayse

Citation: Adrian L. Mayse, (2018) "A Cascading Effect: How Do Audit Rotation Rules Affect Loan Officers’ Perceptions and Decisions for Nonpublic Companies?",  Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 18, ss. 1, pp.167-181

Article Type: Research paper

Publisher: North American Business Press

Abstract:

This study examines whether the existence and type of audit rotation (no rotation, partner or firm) influences loan officers’ perceptions of auditor independence, financial statement reliability and decisions of extending a loan involving nonpublic companies. In an experiment utilizing 122 loan officers, I find that loan officers are more confident the audited financial statements are free from intentional misstatement (omissions) when there is Partner or Firm Rotation compared to No Rotation. Additionally, I find that loan officers are more likely to approve a loan when there is Partner Rotation compared to No Rotation or Firm Rotation.